General | September 2, 2014 | Author: The Super Pharmacist
Deep brain stimulation is an increasingly popular, effective and safe procedure typically carried out to correct or compensate for abnormal signalling in the relevant brain regions. It is applied to severe cases of neurological disorder that do not respond to other treatment options. An example of these is Parkinson's disease. This is a progressive neurological disorder, often resulting in characteristic symptoms such as tremors, stiffness, rigidity and difficulties with walking and co-ordination. It may be associated with other characteristics, such as mild to moderate psychiatric symptoms (e.g. depression) and working memory discrepancies. Parkinson's disease is associated with important structures deep within the brain, and is often not fully addressed by conventional therapies associated with this condition.
Deep brain stimulation is an increasingly common option for Parkinson's disease patients in whom pharmacological treatment is ineffective and/or elicits further motor anomalies. The main targets of this stimulation are brain regions that regulate or modulate the signals of the brain structures damaged by Parkinson's disease. The most common of these are:
A major drawback of deep brain stimulation is the often extensive period of time required for the implant to stabilise and take effect, and thus for responses in the patient to become apparent. However, STN stimulation may considerably improve motor control, and also the life quality of patients. A ten-year study of GPi and STN stimulation showed that both types maintained clinical efficacy over that period, but that STN stimulation alone was associated with a significant reduction in medication use.
Deep brain stimulation is most often recommended for patients who have treatment-resistant, dopamine-responsive Parkinson's disease and exhibit little or no cognitive impairment. The procedure is typically performed approximately 15 years after diagnosis. Unfortunately, these delays in confirming both eligibility for deep brain stimulation and conventional therapy failure often translates in the development of motor symptoms too severe to allow for surgical intervention.
Deep brain stimulation may be applicable and beneficial to a greater number of patients currently denied effective treatment.
Recent reviews of the research into treatment (both pharmacological and surgical) of Parkinson's disease indicates that deep brain stimulation alone or in combination with other conventional treatments results in better outcomes, compared to conventional therapy alone. Deep brain stimulation is associated with up to 60% of motor symptom correction, and may reduce drug requirements by up to 80%. However, this treatment option is also associated with adverse or unwanted effects, the more common of which are outlined below. The typical responses of patients to deep brain stimulation may include some or all of the effects listed below. This research concerns bilateral stimulation (i.e. stimulation of targets in both halves of the brain) unless stated otherwise.
Early trials of STN stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients found that this treatment may induce hypomania (i.e. a state of agitation or high energy, which may be marked by either euphoric or irritable moods) and also inappropriate and/or uncontrollable laughter. This indicates a risk of malfunction in the deep brain stimulator device. On the other hand, stimulation that may cause hypomania is associated with the potential for improved motor control. STN stimulation may also mimic the symptoms of depression.
Many studies have found that patients report improvements in mood as a result of this treatment. A trial comparing STN stimulation to that of the GPi found that mood changes were similar for both treatment groups. Some evidence suggests that patients may experience increased anger (as measured by Visual Analogue Mood Scale scores) as a result of unilateral STN or GPi stimulation.
Patients with Parkinson's disease often experience significant difficulties in timing-based tasks, including working to or keeping a beat. This indicates an inability to maintain conscious control of regular or rhythmic motor activity. STN stimulation can correct these discrepancies to some degree, indicating that it is associated with improvements in conscious motor control. However, finer degrees of timekeeping control (i.e. to hundreds of milliseconds, of which healthy control subjects were capable) was not improved (or worsened) by STN stimulation. Low-frequency (10Hz) stimulation of this area may worsen the common symptom of rigidity. In general, this form of deep brain stimulation is associated with increased motor control in Parkinson's disease patients. Long-term studies of GPi stimulation indicate comparable improvements. A trial of PPN stimulation found that this was associated with significant improvements in gait and balance control, but that these effects were inferior compared to STN stimulation. Further improvements were elicited by a combination of stimulation at both targets and medication.
Different types of timing (e.g. internal timing and interval timing) are crucial to cognition and conscious time processing. Again, brain regions affected by Parkinson's disease play a role in these functions. Sub-optimal STN stimulation (i.e. 10Hz) in 12 patients was found to exacerbate timing discrepancies significantly compared to control with no stimulation. Stimulation at therapeutic frequencies (approximately 130 Hz) reversed this effect, however. A trial comparing two types of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's treatment (STN vs. GPi) found no significant differences in cognitive changes between the respective patient groups. Some research indicates that patients may experience increased confusion as a result of GPi stimulation, in comparison with STN stimulation.
STN stimulation may result in a slight reduction of the ability to recall and choose words that correspond appropriately to a given meaning, or verbal fluency. On the other hand, 10Hz STN stimulation resulted in significant verbal fluency improvements, compared to frequencies of 0Hz and 130Hz.
A study of cognition in 46 patients with STN stimulator implants found that their verbal memory had declined at six and twelve months post-surgery.
Another trial comparing 26 patients with STN implants to 21 without found that the verbal fluency deficiencies in patients with implants were associated with increased delays in word recognition.
A study comparing 23 patients with GPi stimulation to 22 with STN stimulation found that verbal fluency deterioration was significantly worse in the STN group.
may indicate a consequence of the surgical procedure used in the course of STN device implantation, rather than an effect of implant activation. Other studies have found that working memory may be improved by STN stimulation.
Cope TE, Grube M, Mandal A, et al. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinsons disease has no significant effect on perceptual timing in the hundreds of milliseconds range. Neuropsychologia.2014;57:29-37.
Mallet L, Schupbach M, N'Diaye K, et al. Stimulation of subterritories of the subthalamic nucleus reveals its role in the integration of the emotional and motor aspects of behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.2007;104(25):10661-10666.
deSouza RM, Moro E, Lang AE, Schapira AH. Timing of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease: a need for reappraisal? Annals of neurology.2013;73(5):565-575.
Follett KA, Torres-Russotto D. Deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus interna, subthalamic nucleus, and pedunculopontine nucleus for Parkinson's disease: which target? Parkinsonism & related disorders.2012;18 Suppl 1:S165-167.
Temel Y. Limbic effects of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Vitamins and hormones.2010;82:47-63.
Moro E, Lozano AM, Pollak P, et al. Long-term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.2010;25(5):578-586.
Sharma A, Szeto K, Desilets AR. Efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for the treatment of Parkinson disease. The Annals of pharmacotherapy.2012;46(2):248-254.
Krack P, Kumar R, Ardouin C, et al. Mirthful laughter induced by subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.2001;16(5):867-875.
Heo JH, Lee KM, Paek SH, et al. The effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) on cognition in Parkinson disease. Journal of the neurological sciences.2008;273(1-2):19-24.
Woods SP, Fields JA, Troster AI. Neuropsychological sequelae of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a critical review. Neuropsychology review.2002;12(2):111-126.
Okun MS, Fernandez HH, Wu SS, et al. Cognition and mood in Parkinson's disease in subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation: the COMPARE trial. Annals of neurology.2009;65(5):586-595.
Burdick AP, Foote KD, Wu S, et al. Do patient's get angrier following STN, GPi, and thalamic deep brain stimulation. NeuroImage.2011;54 Suppl 1:S227-232.
Joundi RA, Brittain JS, Green AL, Aziz TZ, Jenkinson N. High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus selectively decreases central variance of rhythmic finger tapping in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia.2012;50(10):2460-2466.
Timmermann L, Wojtecki L, Gross J, et al. Ten-Hertz stimulation of subthalamic nucleus deteriorates motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.2004;19(11):1328-1333.
Halpern CH, Rick JH, Danish SF, Grossman M, Baltuch GH. Cognition following bilateral deep brain stimulation surgery of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease. International journal of geriatric psychiatry.2009;24(5):443-451.
Stefani A, Lozano AM, Peppe A, et al. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson's disease. Brain : a journal of neurology.2007;130(Pt 6):1596-1607.
Wojtecki L, Elben S, Timmermann L, et al. Modulation of human time processing by subthalamic deep brain stimulation. PloS one.2011;6(9):e24589.
Wojtecki L, Timmermann L, Jorgens S, et al. Frequency-dependent reciprocal modulation of verbal fluency and motor functions in subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Archives of neurology.2006;63(9):1273-1276.
Ehlen F, Krugel LK, Vonberg I, Schoenecker T, Kuhn AA, Klostermann F. Intact lexicon running slowly--prolonged response latencies in patients with subthalamic DBS and verbal fluency deficits. PloS one.2013;8(11):e79247.